1970 Mercury Cougar vs. 1992 Volvo 480
To start off, 1992 Volvo 480 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1970 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mercury Cougar | 1992 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Cougar | 480 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5769 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2510 mm |