1970 Mercury Cougar vs. 1999 Renault Zo

To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercury Cougar (167 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 75 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercury Cougar (363 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 1970 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 1970 Mercury Cougar has manual transmission. 1970 Mercury Cougar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: