1970 Mercury Cougar vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercury Cougar would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mercury Cougar | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cougar | Nessie |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2790 mm |