1970 MG 1100 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 25 kg more than 1970 MG 1100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 MG 1100. (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1970 MG 1100 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | 1100 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1970 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2420 mm |