1970 MG 1100 vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1970 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1970 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 638 kg more than 1970 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 MG 1100. (104 Nm). This means 2002 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 MG 1100 | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | MG | Honda |
| Model | 1100 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2630 mm |
