1970 MG MGB vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1970 MG MGB. (98 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1970 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 310 kg more than 1970 MG MGB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG TF (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 MG MGB | 2003 MG TF | |
| Make | MG | MG |
| Model | MGB | TF |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1190 kg |
