1970 Mini MK III vs. 1973 Triumph 1500

To start off, 1973 Triumph 1500 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mini MK III would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph 1500 (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1970 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph 1500 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 1500 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1970 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Triumph 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Triumph 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Triumph 1500 (110 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1973 Triumph 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mini MK III.

Compare all specifications: