1970 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2010 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Lincoln Navigator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Lincoln Navigator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Lincoln |
Model | Colt | Navigator |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 5400 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |