1970 Monteverdi 2000 vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 1970 Monteverdi 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1962 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1962 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rover P5 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1970 Monteverdi 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Monteverdi 2000 | 1962 Rover P5 | |
Make | Monteverdi | Rover |
Model | 2000 | P5 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |