1970 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 546 kg more than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | C30 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2639 mm |
