1970 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 191 kg more than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia RIO (167 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Kia RIO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Bluebird | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Bluebird | RIO |
Year Released | 1970 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2570 mm |