1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1970 Nissan Cedric is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,050 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 60 kg more than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Nissan Cedric | 1960 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
| Make | Nissan | Studebaker |
| Model | Cedric | Silver Hawk |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3050 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3070 mm |
