1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 1970 Nissan Cedric is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 715 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Nissan Cedric | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Nissan | Seat |
| Model | Cedric | 600 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |
