1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Nissan Cedric is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 1970 Nissan Cedric and 1967 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 120 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Cedric | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Cedric | 2000 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |