1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 1967 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1970 Nissan Cedric is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1967 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1967 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 550 kg more than 1967 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Cedric | 1967 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Nissan | ZAZ |
Model | Cedric | 966 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 886 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2170 mm |