1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 1996 Seat Toledo
To start off, 1996 Seat Toledo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1996 Seat Toledo. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Toledo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 258 kg more than 1996 Seat Toledo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Seat Toledo. (127 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Seat Toledo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Nissan Cedric | 1996 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Nissan | Seat |
| Model | Cedric | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |
