1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 1999 Acura RL
To start off, 1999 Acura RL is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura RL weights approximately 385 kg more than 1970 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Acura RL (304 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Nissan Cedric | 1999 Acura RL | |
| Make | Nissan | Acura |
| Model | Cedric | RL |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2920 mm |
