1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2000 Seat Alhambra is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Alhambra (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 375 kg more than 1970 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Alhambra (214 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | Nissan | Seat |
Model | Cedric | Alhambra |
Year Released | 1970 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2850 mm |