1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Acura TL
To start off, 2006 Acura TL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,212 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura TL (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura TL weights approximately 285 kg more than 1970 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura TL (316 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Acura TL | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | Cedric | TL |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 258 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 316 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |