1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cedric | Ranger |
Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3193 mm |