1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1431 kg more than 1970 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1970 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2721 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1955 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3100 mm |