1970 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1970 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 501 kg more than 1970 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | XC60 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2774 mm |