1970 NSU 1200 vs. 2004 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2004 Toyota MR2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota MR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota MR2 (142 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1970 NSU 1200. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1970 NSU 1200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota MR2 (170 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 NSU 1200. (81 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 NSU 1200 | 2004 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | NSU | Toyota |
| Model | 1200 | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 142 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 69.2 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.5 mm | 91.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2460 mm |
