1970 NSU 1200 vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1970 NSU 1200. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1970 NSU 1200.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 NSU 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (257 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 NSU 1200. (81 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 NSU 1200 | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | NSU | Mazda |
| Model | 1200 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 69.2 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 19.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3010 mm |
