1970 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 1970 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1970 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 NSU Ro 80 | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
Make | NSU | Seat |
Model | Ro 80 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2390 cc | 1481 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2660 mm |