1970 Opel Ascona vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1970 Opel Ascona. (80 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1970 Opel Ascona.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Opel Ascona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Opel Ascona. (118 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Opel Ascona | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Opel | Citroen |
Model | Ascona | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.8 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |