1970 Plymouth Barracuda vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 5,563 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda (290 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2002 Subaru Outback. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda should accelerate faster than 2002 Subaru Outback.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Plymouth Barracuda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda (468 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Subaru Outback. (224 Nm). This means 1970 Plymouth Barracuda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Plymouth Barracuda | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Plymouth | Subaru |
| Model | Barracuda | Outback |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5563 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.6 mm | 99.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
