1970 Plymouth Barracuda vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 5,563 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda (290 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda should accelerate faster than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1970 Plymouth Barracuda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Plymouth Barracuda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Plymouth Barracuda (468 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (255 Nm). This means 1970 Plymouth Barracuda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Plymouth Barracuda | 2003 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Plymouth | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Barracuda | Magna |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5563 cc | 2971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
