1970 Renault 4 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (123 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1970 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1970 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 695 kg more than 1970 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Renault 4 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 4 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
