1970 Renault 4 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1970 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1970 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 880 kg more than 1970 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Renault 4 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Renault | Cadillac |
| Model | 4 | ATS |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1805 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1421 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2775 mm |
