1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2005 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Smart ForTwo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1345 kg more than 2005 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2005 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Smart |
Model | Silver Shadow | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 22 L |