1970 Rover P5B vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1970 Rover P5B. (159 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1970 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 330 kg more than 1970 Rover P5B. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Rover P5B. (295 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Rover P5B.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Rover P5B | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | P5B | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 3528 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2830 mm |
