1970 Rover P5B vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1970 Rover P5B. (159 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1970 Rover P5B.
Because 1970 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1970 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Rover P5B | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Rover | Volvo |
| Model | P5B | S40 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 3528 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 159 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 295 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
