1970 Triumph 1300 vs. 2010 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2010 Renault Laguna is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Renault Laguna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Laguna (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Laguna (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Triumph 1300 | 2010 Renault Laguna | |
| Make | Triumph | Renault |
| Model | 1300 | Laguna |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.8 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 70 L |
