1970 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 487 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (207 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Triumph | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1757 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2880 mm |
