1970 Triumph 2000 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Triumph 2000 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Triumph | Mazda |
| Model | 2000 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |
