1970 Triumph Herald vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 800 kg more than 1970 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Triumph Herald | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Triumph | Acura |
| Model | Herald | CL |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1147 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69.4 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 65 L |
