1970 Volkswagen 1600 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Volkswagen 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1970 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1970 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1970 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Volkswagen 1600 | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volkswagen |
Model | 1600 | Polo |
Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1421 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1650 mm |