1970 Zastava 1300 vs. 2012 Audi A3

To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi A3 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A3 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: