1970 Zastava 1300 vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1970 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Barina (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Zastava 1300 | 2012 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Zastava | Holden |
| Model | 1300 | Barina |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
