1970 Zastava 2101 vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (124 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 357 kg more than 1970 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (155 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications: