1971 Abarth 124 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Abarth 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Abarth 124 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1971 Abarth 124. (126 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1971 Abarth 124. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 748 kg more than 1971 Abarth 124. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Abarth 124. (157 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Abarth 124.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Abarth 124 2002 Cadillac CTS
Make Abarth Cadillac
Model 124 CTS
Year Released 1971 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1756 cc 3173 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 126 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 157 Nm 296 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 3400 RPM
Vehicle Weight 870 kg 1618 kg


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]