1971 Abarth A 112 vs. 1963 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1971 Abarth A 112 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Abarth A 112 | 1963 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3300 mm |
