1971 Abarth A 112 vs. 1974 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1974 Lotus Eclat is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 370 kg more than 1971 Abarth A 112.
Because 1974 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Abarth A 112 | 1974 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | A 112 | Eclat |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2440 mm |
