1971 Abarth A 112 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 907 kg more than 1971 Abarth A 112.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Abarth A 112 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | A 112 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2890 mm |
