1971 Abarth A 112 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Abarth A 112 would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1971 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1971 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Abarth A 112 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Abarth | Smart |
| Model | A 112 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2013 |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 1867 mm |
