1971 AC 428 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 AC 428 (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (210 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 162 kg more than 1971 AC 428.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 AC 428 (639 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (264 Nm). This means 1971 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 AC 428 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | 428 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7003 cc | 2786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 298 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 639 Nm | 264 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2890 mm |
