1971 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750. (170 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 1750 | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
