1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano vs. 1965 Volvo 120
To start off, 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano (86 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano weights approximately 38 kg more than 1965 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano (191 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano | 1965 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Caimano | 120 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2610 mm |