1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano weights approximately 112 kg more than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano (191 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (158 Nm). This means 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Alfa Romeo Caimano | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
| Model | Caimano | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2270 mm |
